Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumarchy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Consumarchy

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Consumarchy
• Articles for deletion/Consumarchy (2nd nomination)

Consumarchy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The original AfD rationale said "Prodded as protologism, based on coinage of one a single researcher." It was deleted, but the article was recreated anyway. Nothing has changed, though; as best I can tell all the "references" except one really are just talking about the concept in general and never use the word consumarchy anyway. (See http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2004/01/against-all-odds for an example of a "reference" given in the article).

To be sure, the idea of ethical consumerism exists, it's just, uh, at ethical consumerism. If this neologism turns out to have merit after all, this article should be merged and redirected to ethical consumerism anyway, as they seem to be covering the same concept. However, a Google reveals that the only sites talking about this are User:Consumarchy's blog (prominently linked at the end of the article), Wikipedia, Wikipedia mirrors, and other wikis. Yeah, this term doesn't actually exist, so just delete. Again. One paper does not a new term make. SnowFire (talk) 06:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:58, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nothing on google news or books that talk about this term. Delete and possibly SALT per WP:NEO Corpx (talk) 19:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete again. Maybe speedy. WP:NEO. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.