Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constantinos Antonopoulos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Constantinos Antonopoulos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. No independent sources. does make a claim of notability, so can't CSD. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this might be the case. Could I ask something? If it does get deleted, is there any chance it might be passable as a sub-section in Intralot's article in its current form? Thanks Dirty83 (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty83 That much content (especially with most of it unsourced) would be WP:UNDUE and a WP:COATRACK on the intralot article, but a very brief section covering him as the CEO and focusing on his actions within the company would be fine. (his history outside the company would not be) However, as a WP:BLP everything must be sourced to WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Made some edits, cut a lot of unsourced content and added one more independent source. I believe everything mentioned now is sourced properly. I'm not sure why it shouldn't qualify for WP:GNG. It's about the head of a major company and a public figure, often mentioned in Greek media. Open to suggestions of course... Dirty83 (talk) 12:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 19:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.