Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conrad Mieschke (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Mieschke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Last AfD was closed because I had pinged those who had previously commented on its notability, which was judged to have tainted the discussion. Hopefully we can get it resolved this time. Boleyn (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable sources and no real notability even if verifiable.--Rpclod (talk) 12:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: (Repeating my contribution to the previous AfD) Highbeam and Questia searches turn up nothing, Google turns up the usual user-submitted art sites such as SaatchiArt. There is also a snippet view indicating that a painting by the subject achieved a 3rd prize in 1981, but neither that nor the Brampton Arts Council Arts Person of the Year award is evidence of meeting the WP:ARTIST criteria or those of broader biographical notability. (Also responding to this article identified in the previous AfD: Local paper coverage, which is normal coverage for a working artist, but not evidence of meeting the WP:ARTIST notability criteria. ) AllyD (talk) 16:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: agreeing with AllyD, and additionally pointing out that the Brampton Arts Council is merely a regional arts agency (a suburb of Toronto) and thus not substantial enough to establish notability. Additionally, this article makes it clear that the exhibition is part of a member supported gallery system. These kinds of exhibitions do not establish notability (and in fact are red flags for it). Theredproject (talk) 21:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable and lacks reliable sources and fails WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.