Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conrad Istanbul Bosphorus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Istanbul Bosphorus[edit]

Conrad Istanbul Bosphorus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, Conrad Istanbul Bosphorus, seems to be here simply to promote the hotel and largely includes contributions from a paid editor, User:Valgetova. Leutha (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This article was created without the {{afd2}} template and was never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination itself at this time. @Leutha: For future nominations please fully follow the procedures as WP:AFDHOWTO. Thanks. --Finngall talk 17:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:05, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I hope they didn't pay that editor much because article is pure PROMO; it makes no claim to notability and provides no reliable, secondary sourcing. Delete what appears to be a non-notable ordinary, large, modern hotel. A quick earch didn't turn up anything but routine coverage, but if somebody finds solid sourcing to support notability, feel free to flag me to reconsider.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:39, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:41, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No sign of passing either the general or the specific notability guidelines, since all the independent coverage apparently available is either passing mentions or booking sites. No indication that this is any more notable than an average urban hotel. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.