Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquest (gametype)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conquest (gametype)[edit]

Conquest (gametype) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A game type particular to the Battlefield series. Nothing here that can't just be mentioned in the Battlefield article, and it's not referenced. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Battlefield (video game series)#Development history where the mode is mentioned.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 18:25, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, and do not redirect. "Conquest" is a fairly generic name that is used across multiple different games (eg Unreal[1] or Hearthstone[2]) and is not specific to the Battlefield series. This makes it too vague a term to serve as a useful redirect. Lowercaserho (talk) 04:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Lowercaserho. The subject of the article does not have the sourcing needed to establish notability, and the term is too generic to make a useful redirect. Rorshacma (talk) 16:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.