Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquerors from the Darkness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Robert Silverberg. Sandstein 17:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conquerors from the Darkness[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-unreferenced article doesn't appear to me at WP:NBOOK despite well-known author. Mikeblas (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Robert Silverberg, but with history. Part of the issue here is the time period, as there may be more sources off the internet. However I can't really find anything to show that this book merits a separate article at this point in time. I would say that this should re-direct with history in case more sources are found, although part of me thinks that it's somewhat unlikely, so that when we do have enough coverage to show that the book passes WP:NBOOK, we'll have something to pull from. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.