Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congolese Australians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 08:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congolese Australians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have no idea what the notability guidelines are here, but one statistical document and one person from the DRC who moved to Australia doesn't seem sufficient. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I do understand the rationale of this proposal. The flow of people from the Congo is as important as many other groups of immigrants. --Bduke (Discussion) 10:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 02:46, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 02:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Here are three more references I found without even trying: [1] [2] [3]. There are many more. More than sufficient to support a more in-depth article, quite sufficient for WP:NEXIST to support WP:GNG. Aoziwe (talk) 12:46, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there are some OR problems with the initial set of references, but there are plenty available, both mentioned already and a lot of others. The topic is certainly significant enough with equivalents. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes notability. M A A Z T A L K 21:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.