Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confederation of Italian Entrepreneurs Worldwide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 22:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confederation of Italian Entrepreneurs Worldwide[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete: Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy-delete-tagged {{db-corp}} at 16:25, 11 June 2009 by User:Leonard^Bloom
Deletion queried on 28 October 2009 by this message in my user talk page (Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)):-[reply]
- Hi Anthony -
  A colleague of mine tried to start a new article titled "Confederation of Italian Entrepreneurs Worldwide", which was deleted by you. I would like to question your decision to consider "not notable" this organization, which reports to the Italian Government and connects thousands of entrepreneurs worldwide. The Italian version of Wikipedia, as a matter of fact, does include an article: it:Confederazione degli Imprenditori Italiani nel Mondo. The organization is also often referenced by the international press. I would like to ask you to reconsider and allow us to re-publish. Thank you, Giovanni.Gbattistini (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Abductive (reasoning) 16:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've added to the article "Giovanni"'s claim that "the organization is also often referenced by the international press" to circumvent the Speedy Delete A7 argument that I'd otherwise have made. With CSD#A7 off the table, good faith Google searches under the Italian spelling of the name reveal a bucketload of hits, so I'm satisfied that the criteria at WP:N are made out and the article should be retaind. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 15:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Bucketload of hits - Ret.Prof (talk) 02:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.