Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condiment market in the United States

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ~~keep~~ REDIRECT. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 03:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My bad I misread the bottom !vote - No objections to anyone reverting the redirect providing it's expanded obviously. –Davey2010^Talk 03:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Condiment market in the United States[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see why this aricle needs to be here. Not part of a series on condiments by country, not much content, only one citation. Not a particularly well-defined topic, either. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (inform) @ 00:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep – Passes WP:N. Source examples include, but are not limited to: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Another option is to merge it to Condiment, since the article is rather short. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, just no. Here we have an article whose total text is shorter than the category template pasted at the bottom. It says nothing that cannot be said in Condiment. What it does do is promise more articles on condiment marketing - one for every nation - joy! Pax 13:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect for now. Can always be split out again should it grow. -Arb. (talk) 14:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral – The article is a superstub right now, but I wonder how long it could become if relevant sources are used to expand it. T C N7JM 15:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.