Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conde du Venz, Count of Venz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete as a hoax. Teke (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- While I know CSD doesn't outline hoaxes, sometimes you just have to be bold. No prod or Afd needed. Teke (talk) 05:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Conde du Venz, Count of Venz[edit]
I don't believe this is real. I think it is basically a hash of unrelated sentences or paragraphs from the 1911 Britannica or elsewhere. Jmabel | Talk 05:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. This thing is hard to follow; if nothing else, it needs a lot of cleaning up. Djcartwright 05:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is the biography of Odo, Count of Paris, with a few names changed here and there. Grutness...wha? 06:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - blatant hoax per Grutness. My Alt Account 07:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. User:Grutness is on the money. --S0uj1r0 08:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per above. VegaDark 09:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. A hoax article does not fall under a Speedy Delete. Thε Halo Θ 11:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The text for this article was taken directly from another article and 2 or 3 words were replaced. If that isn't speedyable then I fear what happens when vandals find that out. I'd say it falls under G3 as pure vandalism. In fact, I'm going to tag it as such right now and see what the reviewing admin decides. VegaDark 05:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.