Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conctuio
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete a7 -- since the film is being "released" only on YouTube, it counts as nonnotable webcontent under a7. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Conctuio[edit]
- Conctuio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Independent film for future release. Says it will be a direct-to-Youtube/Myspace film. Fails WP:N, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NFF. Redfarmer (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete and close of this afd why was this AFD'd? this is a straight forward DB delete. --Fredrick day (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Which one of the Criteria for Speedy Deletion do you think this falls under? Because fiction doesn't normally fall under Speedy and notability is never an issue in Speedy. Redfarmer (talk) 17:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course fiction falls under speedy - read what is actually been said - whatever they call it, it's a home video, they admit as much in the text. In regards to notability, Notability. Articles that seem to have obviously non-notable subjects are not eligible for speedy deletion unless the article does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. This actually goes one stage further in the other direction and ASSERTS it's not notable. The article explains it's two friends with no money who are going to stick up their film on youtube. If we had AFD's for every home video that someone stuck up, the whole system would grind to a halt! --Fredrick day (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually I beg to differ. I can't count the number of times I've been denied speedys on fiction in the past. ;) Once again, I ask, which criteria do you think this falls under? I'm more than happy to tag it if you think you can find a criteria. And as for notability, Speedy does not determine notability. AfD does. If there's even the slightest suggestion of importance, it does not qualify for Speedy. Redfarmer (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course fiction falls under speedy - read what is actually been said - whatever they call it, it's a home video, they admit as much in the text. In regards to notability, Notability. Articles that seem to have obviously non-notable subjects are not eligible for speedy deletion unless the article does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. This actually goes one stage further in the other direction and ASSERTS it's not notable. The article explains it's two friends with no money who are going to stick up their film on youtube. If we had AFD's for every home video that someone stuck up, the whole system would grind to a halt! --Fredrick day (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Which one of the Criteria for Speedy Deletion do you think this falls under? Because fiction doesn't normally fall under Speedy and notability is never an issue in Speedy. Redfarmer (talk) 17:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is advertising. It is no more advertising than other big films like Cloverfield (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloverfield). This article shouldn't be deleted as is encyclopedic, it is informing people about the film just like any other film on here does. If you feel the need to delete this, maybe you should consider deleteing all other movies- how are they different? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul-clifford (talk • contribs) 20:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn film - a Google search for Concutio and one of the "main actors" returns only one result - the Wikipedia article. Article name is incorrect - should be Concutio. Would recommend speedy delete (criteria G11 - article is an advert for a film). --Snigbrook (talk) 19:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.