Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concordia Middle School
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Concordia USD 333. I will redirect with history preserved so anyone can merge what is required to the school district article. Davewild (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Concordia Middle School[edit]
- Concordia Middle School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable middle school. I redirected to the school district, but it was contested. Therefore, here I am recommending that the school is redirected per standard practice for non-notable elementary and middle schools. The premise of notability presented by another editor was that the school is notable because the school district has a middle school and a separate junior high school. In my opinion, this may lend to the notability of the school district, but the school itself, continues to lack notability. Cindamuse (talk) 21:11, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep likely will never be more than a stub, and a redirect could be acceptable if the re-direct would contain the notable information in the original article but the original re-direct did not. Notability arises from the school district having both a "middle" school and "junior high" school, were most (if not perhaps all) other districts/systems in at least the US have either a middle school or a junior high. Students in this district are required to go through both--first through the middle school, then through the junior high.--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:40, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Merging was suggested in 2008. I chimed in against, and no one responded (see Talk:Concordia Middle School.--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- merge into the district, as always for middle schools unless there is something actually special. Even if the assertion is true that the organizational aspect is unique, this in no sense is special enough for encyclopedic notability. I'm glad it's finally been accepted that we can use the relatively simple method of AfD to take care of disputed closes. Otherwise there would be no practical alternative but to delete and rewrite. DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Schools below high schools are a pain to maintain cause the kids, on whom you would normally wish to help with editing, spend almost all their time, 90:1 on vandalizing! A lost cause. If we semi-protect the article, no updates at all; but if we don't most of the edits are either vandalization or reversion of them. A total waste of editors time. Student7 (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Response there is no evidence of that happening on this page, and "it might get vandalized" is not a reason to delete an article.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Wikipedia standard practice for non-notable primary schools. Carrite (talk) 21:42, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per User:Carrite. Jrcla2 (talk) 05:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per the long standing consensus. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, a pain. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.