Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concerned Citizens Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Constitution Party (United States). (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concerned Citizens Party[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article only links to one sources and is defunct. It does not appear to have any elected officers or any non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Any useful information can be folded into Constitution Party (United States). Toa Nidhiki05 11:13, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 13:33, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the Constitution Party (United States) article: This page doesn't seem notable enough to have its own article, but since the party has a different name than the national party, a redirect would be useful. --1990'sguy (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 11:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the Constitution Party (United States).E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@E.M.Gregory: - you haven't actually justified this, even if you were just going to opt for a "per nom" Nosebagbear (talk) 12:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Justification: This nonnotable party was a state-level affiliate of the Constitution Party (United States).E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.