Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concentrated stock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Diversification (finance). No content has been deleted, so editors are free to check the history and merge anything useful into the target. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concentrated stock[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to indicate this concept is sufficiently notable to warrant a WP article that would ever be more than a dictionary definition. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Redirect to Diversification (finance). Not sure the redirect is necessary, but a stand-alone page definitely is not necessary. Power~enwiki (talk) 00:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not sure if it should be kept or delete. It may be important within the stock, business or academic sectors. Writer should establish appropriate inline citation/refrences Chrisswill (talk) 22:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no references provided, let alone any reliable sources. Even if reliable sources provided, this seems like a dictionary entry.--Rpclod (talk) 02:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Diversification (finance). A Google Books search quickly establishes that this is a notable subject in the field, and one for which readers might benefit from having some encyclopedic coverage. However, it is merely the opposite position from having sufficient diversification, so can be covered in that article. bd2412 T 13:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.