Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conan Albrecht
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conan Albrecht[edit]
- Conan Albrecht (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Comment Assistant professor in an University, fails the Wikipedia:Professor test.Stellatomailing 14:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete his notability would be as a computer fraud detection specialist, not an academic, and I don't see it demonstrated here. DGG 04:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Since his notability as computer fraud detection specialist is unsourced and looks dependant on his academical career, I focused on this angle, what would be the only thing who could assert some notability.Stellatomailing 23:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the article fails to establish notability. --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 05:17, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 18:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; very few news and normal academic output. John Vandenberg 09:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, academic productivity looks appropriate for an assistant prof at a research university but not special enough yet to be noteworthy here. The article is full of fluff: Mormon missionary work, resemblence to Stargate characters, support of open source, spends time learning about new technology? Some amount of human interest is ok but this just looks like unencyclopedic filler. —David Eppstein 19:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.