Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computrols Incorporated (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Computrols Incorporated[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article exists since 2007 and not a single secondary sources was provided all those years. Fails WP:CORP. Muhandes (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this does not pass WP:GNG from searching materials online. The article also had WP:CHANCE and nothing has happened to gather reliable sources to support it. $Tushi Talk To Me$ 17:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no independent reliable sources that indicate this corporation (or company) is notable. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 05:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.