Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Competition (economics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Competition (economics)[edit]

Competition (economics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'd take a paragraph listing what exactly is wrong with this article, but I think it's clearly expressed by the amount of tags: This article has little references and, in my opinion takes an unencyclopedic tone, and I feel the economy section under the main article does or would do a better job of this. Either it should be deleted entirely, or it should be merged with Competition#Economics_and_business. – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 16:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is an important topic in the field of economics. There is a need for an article on this topic and it is certainly a notable topic.45.72.152.96 (talk) 23:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Obviously notable JonSonberg (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  11:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep An appropriate topic for an article, well-integrated into articles related to the subject of economics and backed by reliable and verifiable sources. Alansohn (talk) 16:54, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.