Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compass Pointe Golf Course

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Compass Pointe Golf Course[edit]

Compass Pointe Golf Course (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has some mentions in local news, and is mentioned at 2 websites I added links to (I think they would count as reliable sources, but not to establish notability). I couldn't find enough to establish notability and there is no obvious potential merge/redirect taget for this orphaned page. Has beent agged for notability for over 3 years. Pinging those who have looked at its notability before: HotshotCleaner, William Avery,DGG. Boleyn (talk) 07:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I recommend adding this information in Pasadena, Maryland since it has a section for sports but nothing on golf. i don't see this as stand alone article material, but a mention in Pasadena, Maryland makes sense for a news noted golf course. Bryce Carmony (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete We often do keep golf courses. But this is not a notable one--it consists of 4 nine hole golf courses, without any full 2=18-hole courses; the references include only their web site and 2 mere listings. DGG ( talk ) 16:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.