Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Sense (program)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. BJTalk 23:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Common Sense (program)[edit]
- Common Sense (program) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original deletion reason: article fails to assert why this internet radio program, out of thousands, is notable. Lacks 3rd party verifiable references.
This is a procedural nomination after contested Prod Gwernol 09:30, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Procedural nominations are not obligatory on contested PRODs. We have enough to do at AFD without having to consider them.--Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I never said they were. I am nominating this because I believe the original deletion reason has enough merit to warrant a debate here. Please address the issue of notability addresses in the deletion reason provided. Gwernol 22:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No opinion in that case. I couldn't tell whether you agreed with the PROD reason. I note that this program is not just an Internet radio program, but is syndicated to broadcast radio. On the other hand, I can't find verifiable information about how many stations actually air it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I never said they were. I am nominating this because I believe the original deletion reason has enough merit to warrant a debate here. Please address the issue of notability addresses in the deletion reason provided. Gwernol 22:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not appear to be notable. All references inside are to the organization that produces the show. Additionally, 15k "subscribers" is hardly overwhelming even if true, given its worldwide scope. A moderately popular YouTube vid of the day gets three times that. Ray Yang (talk) 22:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.