Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Grant Application
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Common Grant Application[edit]
- Common Grant Application (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No sign of notability apart from press releases in industry publications & most of the article is about why the concept of the company is good, rather than about the company itself. I initially CSD'd this as A7/G11, but decided to restore & bring it to AfD instead.. Versageek 07:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reliable independent source for notability, also spammy.--Boffob (talk) 15:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello! Some of these points were previously discussed with Pedro : Chat before the initial posting and are part of Talk:Common Grant Application. It should be noted that the industry articles listed on the page were not the result of any press releases, but in fact were initiated in all cases by the respective authors/editors independently contacting the Common Grant Application. As a question, what additional information about the company do you feel would be helpful? Lulayellowlab (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Multiple sources, important project. Probably could find a few dozens o more, but it does not seem necessary. DGG (talk) 02:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 12:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, references seem to amount to trivial coverage and/or unreliable sources. Stifle (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Misleading title: not about a "common grant application", but rather about an online grant application and management system - i.e. a commercial business offering a programme to generate grant applications. Judging from the titles, the supplied references deal generally with grants. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.