Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Cause (alliance) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Common Cause (alliance)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not notable and linked to very few articles within Wikipedia. Ħ MIESIANIACAL 02:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no independent reliable source with in depth coverage. Nothing obivous in google. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete they have a virtually inactive website, with the last news release being 6 years ago. Nothing in the media that I can find even from that time. Not notable at all. NealeFamily (talk) 03:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I simply found nothing at all to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 04:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Appears to fail WP:GNG, although it's hard to go hunting for sources on this name. Combinations with "Commonwealth" and "republican" did not help. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches did not turn up anything to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.