Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comic Book Cast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole keep !voter has not provided a valid, policy-based rationale. Deor (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comic Book Cast[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A nomination for an award is not notability DGG ( talk ) 14:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 15:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Perhaps the nomination is not enough, but I think the time the podcast has been ahead helps. Their Facebook has 7427 likes, Youtube channel over 6700 subscribers, and was viewed 635 times this month, so there are a decent number of fans. Frmorrison (talk) 16:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
With apologies to Frmorrison, I'm afraid I wouldn't give weight to either of his or her !votes in this debate. Neither the number of references the article has, nor the number of likes their Facebook page has, nor the number of subscribers their Youtube channel has, are contributors to notability. What this content needs is non-trivial coverage in reliable sources and I haven't been able to find any. Delete.—S Marshall T/C 19:39, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Agreed with S Marshall. None of that social media junk carries weight on Wikipedia. ~~Also, shouldn't one of those "keeps" be discounted, as they are from the same user?~~(removed by user) United States Man (talk) 05:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.