Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combatant Gentlemen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Combatant Gentlemen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every reference, even Fortune, is a slightly disguised press release or a notice.Any number of non-independent references do not show notability. As for Forbes, "Most promising company" means not yet notable. The ones that have actually accomplished their promise are the ones that are notable. DGG ( talk ) 02:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- being #"#91 on its list of America's Most Promising Companies" strongly suggests that it's WP:TOOSOON for this company to have an encyclopedia entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.