Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Color War

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, consensus is that is is notable enough especially after rewrite with sources. Davewild (talk) 20:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Color War[edit]

I don't think this game has enough notability/ WP:CRYSTAL VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 05:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I was considering nominating this article for a while, actually. On the one hand, I know it is played at a lot of camps, but on the other, it doesn't make it into the news, as far as I've seen. This one's a tough call, which is why I'm not !voting just yet. I will say, though, that it does not look like a WP:CRYSTAL violation to me. WP:N perhaps, but not CRYSTAL. Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 05:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think it's an activity at every summer camp, there for there must be some notabilty out there for it. However this article pure original research if no improvments are made by the end of the AFD you can consider my vote delete. Ridernyc (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, only Jewish summer camps? Needs secondary sources to assert the subject's importance. Lankiveil (talk) 10:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Keep with improvement. this Google News search shows that the subject is indeed notable (it is covered in a number of sources in relation to schools and summer camps). The article as it currently stands is obviously somewhat inaccurate and OR-y. I can go in now and re-write the stub so that is more generalized and appropriate, but I don't have time to synthesize references right now. LaMenta3 (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Per Lamenta3. RuneWiki⁷⁷⁷ 23:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Whether or not the article needs improvement, the game is notable & should be sourceable. DGG (talk) 02:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the reliable sourcing provided, and the recent re-write. Pastordavid (talk) 19:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.