Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colloquial Cantonese in Hong Kong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hong Kong Cantonese. Sandstein 20:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colloquial Cantonese in Hong Kong[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article is remnant stub after merging what was useful (not much) to the Hong Kong Cantonese article as proposed in Talk Sirlanz (talk) 01:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it is a WP:GNG passing topic but it really need expert in this field by citing academic publication and avoid to publish their own original research, for example, study of Chinese/Cantonese people in Hong Kong by their Cantonese accents (in the past each immigrants to the city state have their own accents). Note that Afd is not really a good place to start merge discussion if the topic itself is GNG passing Matthew hk (talk) 07:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hong Kong Cantonese. As the information was merged there, this should have been done per WP:MERGE. Redirect preserves page history and can be undone by any editor, so if an editor with expertise can write an article on this that meets notability, it is easy enough for them to replace the redirect with the new content. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 11:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.