Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collaboration - A pillar of Organizational Behaviour
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Collaboration - A pillar of Organizational Behaviour[edit]
- Collaboration - A pillar of Organizational Behaviour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Essay / original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Besides the WP:OR issue, I just referred to the Organisational Behaviour textbook that I still have from my MA (currently selling it online if anyone wants it) and Collaboration gets a four-line paragraph on page 238. Hardly a "pillar" of the subject! -- roleplayer 16:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.
- Delete. Original research, how-to guide, essayish style, and likely meant to sell something: Not only is the "two-way street" a good idea on a philosophical level, but technology-enabled collaboration is simply making it an imperative. Yet it is clear that we are still in the midst of making this fundamental shift in our ways of thinking and working together--we haven't quite made it yet. Business collaboration is where people assist and co-operate with colleagues and other contacts to further a particular aspect of the business that they share. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, essay, OR. Hairhorn (talk) 11:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.