Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin O'More

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Reywas92^Talk 18:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Colin O'More[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Citations for this include draft registration cards, social security index, and a census record – that's a primary source WP:REFBOMB! The short obituary in the Tampa Tribune is the only independent coverage, but this does not get to passing WP:GNG. Reywas92^Talk 18:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 18:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He's covered in numerous GNewspaper articles, this is the first one I found [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 20:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Plenty of coverage in music press, see https://archive.org/search?sin=TXT&query=%22colin+o%27more%22 Piecesofuk (talk) 15:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Since the article was tagged, an additional independent source has been added which also verifies notability. Being one of the first individuals to top the American music charts the subject is clearly notable. The two draft registration cards and The Evening World article are included to show that James Harrod and Colin O'More are the same person. Both draft registration cards show the same date and place of birth, with the WWI card under Harrod and the WWII card under O'More. Igbo (talk) 02:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as multiple reliable sources references have been added to the article since nomination so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.