Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Leuschke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence has been presented to show that this BLP meets our notability standards. Therefore, the concerns regarding this article's inclusion are found valid. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Leuschke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. There is a little coverage around him in relation to the Leaky homes crisis but nothing to build a BLP on. Being on the Hobson Community Board is not enough for WP:NPOL. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:34, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nom. Making the news for commenting on a few leaky buildings and being friends with John Key and Rod Petrecivic is no claim to notability. Fails GNG. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 19:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as norability seems to be drawn from association rather than self NealeFamily (talk) 00:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep well-known and controversial architect in Auckland. His involvement in local politics and other connections are related to his architectural practice. The article needs more work but he is certainly notable.Rick570 (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 17:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 19:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.