Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Ingram (producer)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. henrik•talk 10:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Colin Ingram (producer)[edit]
- Colin Ingram (producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable producer JayJayTalk to me 03:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - I'm not totally sure about this; there's quite a few articles making reference to him, though a lot of that seems to be recycled press releases. He's produced some high-profile productions, and to that extent he would seem important in his field and notable. However, the lack of detailed coverage is a worry. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Searching for Colin Ingram on Google yields plenty of results, but they're all similar to the three links in the article: passing mentions, rather than in-depth coverage (or even moderately detailed coverage). Fails WP:GNG. Terence7 (talk) 04:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.