Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Fiedler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 23:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Fiedler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't seen a tremendous amount of coverage and this seems like a solid case of WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. Mkdw ^talk 20:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E , even if some might argue that he was dead during that event. There seems little potential for an actual biography. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. -- Scray (talk) 03:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A clear case of WP:BLP1E ("living" obviously applies because if he'd died then nobody would be paying any attention). He might be mentioned in Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation if anyone had any sources, but based on the terrible state of the article and the fact that he's done nothing except undergo a medical procedure, deletion is called for. There may be a case for an article for very exceptional subjects of very significant medical procedures, e.g. first heart transplant patient or first test tube baby, but only if they receive a lot of detailed press coverage, which this doesn't meet. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - What is notable and being covered is the resuscitation tecchnique for what I was able to find. See [1] for an aexmaple. -- Whpq (talk) 15:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.