Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Bennett (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:HEY (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Bennett (actor)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly NN actor. Unable to find any in-depth coverage. Toddst1 (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Toddst1 (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is one of literally hundreds of articles sourced only to IMDb. In a discussion on another such article yesterday it was determined that IMDb had conflacted two different actresses into one article. Not everyone who ever had a credited role in a commercially released film production is notable, but that may even be a more strict criteria than IMDb uses. We need to stop being an IMDb mirror. This is a long standing problem, with many of these IMDb only sourced articles dating back well over a decade.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He's more than just an actor: I've update a little bit with a number of references Piecesofuk (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: The subject seems to pass WP:GNG, as per WP:HEY. WP:NACTOR is less clear-cut, but the article is worth keeping, in my opinion. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep passes WP:GNG Covideditnerd (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)~~ — Covideditnerd (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WP:SOCKSTRIKE 21:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. WP:HEY, DiamondRemley39, Piecesofuk, nice work with the adds. The additions show that enough sources WP:NEXIST to at least satisfy GNG. Looks like plenty of room to improve the article still, but that's not really grounds for deletion. --2pou (talk) 05:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to additional sources found by Piecesofuk. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 01:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to be notable due to his work with Tony Hart alone. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.