Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colette carr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Colette carr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claim of current single for which she is "known", but no hits for "Colette Carr" on Google News. Appears to lack notability. —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All I could find was this - the single is #7 on MTV.com's most viewed videos today. Given the company in that top 10, it's either (a) really weird that there are no news articles about her, or (b) the subject of a vote-stuffing campaign to get a non-notable artist onto the most viewed list. --Stormie (talk) 05:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's why I treated the lack of Google News results as a rationale for possible deletion. I saw that there were plenty of Google Web hits, but rather than run through them painstakingly to find something that wasn't an autogenerated listing or a MySpace site or a press release I figured that if a current singer with a current release is notable at all, there's gonna be something on Google News. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone can find more info. I couldn't Vartanza (talk) 21:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:NTEMP, does not appear to be notable yet and can be remade if later when/if there's actually information to put on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VernoWhitney (talk • contribs) 20:09, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.