Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coleford Music Festival
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete due to lack of evidence for notability. пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Coleford Music Festival[edit]
- Coleford Music Festival (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced orphan article which reads as advertorial. Guy (Help!) 22:58, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am concerned that the nomination does not pertain to the article's suitability for deletion, but merely to WP:PROBLEMS with its WP:CURRENT state. A few minutes searching Google News turns up the following articles devoted to the topic: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] (there are many more). Did the nominator not research the topic per WP:BEFORE? Skomorokh 09:42, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It has had a maintenance tag on it for two years and has never been fixed or sourced. Feel free to fix it, but as it stands it fails policy. Guy (Help!) 10:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You haven't offered a reason to delete the article yet... the rationale seems to be WP:NOEFFORT Skomorokh 10:51, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It has had a maintenance tag on it for two years and has never been fixed or sourced. Feel free to fix it, but as it stands it fails policy. Guy (Help!) 10:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 22:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.