Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coldwood Interactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The opposition to deletion would have been more persuasive had the sources actually been furnished for review in the discussion, but in 7 days this did not occur. Daniel (talk) 02:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coldwood Interactive[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure the subject meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG; it's mentioned in various news articles about Unravel, but I'm not sure the non-trivial coverage can't or shouldn't go in the articles about the games or is significant enough to justify a discrete article. Adam9007 (talk) 04:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, so far as I can see the company does appear in "multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". The WP:GNG precepts do not say that those articles need to be about something other than the primary product of the company, which in this case is (understandably) their first two games. Eoghan (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eoghan, That's true, but the sources do need to [address] the topic directly and in detail (from WP:GNG). Could you post links to your best three sources here so that other editors can assess whether they are sufficient to pass WP:NORG / WP:GNG? Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails to meet WP:NORG, perhaps redirecting to Unravel (video game) would be a good option here ~RAM (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Though still a stub, the article could be extended with other relevant information about this company, their position in the Swedish games industry, their work with folk musicians, etc.Eoghan (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eoghan, are there sufficient reliable sources that cover this? IceWelder [✉] 15:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An (albeit limited) search for sources turned up press releases, interviews with the CEO, a profile on the website of the incubator that they're based in, and quite a bit of content about Unravel, but nothing with sufficient coverage of the company to count towards WP:GNG. I don't think that a redirect makes sense: we have articles about more than one of their games, so there is not an obvious target. Wham2001 (talk) 07:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.