Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coke Zero Facial Profiler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguments for keeping this page don't seem to address the notability question. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coke Zero Facial Profiler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable; fails WP:GNG. Ironholds (talk) 18:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 20:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: While this was a complete spam-placement, I have rewritten the article and added some better (though not excellent) references.--Milowent (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Good Work - Ret.Prof (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's still spam, giving coverage to a non-notable marketing tool. Mashable is user submitted, Mutineer and GenWow are brief blog posts, leaving NBC New York. This hasn't received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Fences&Windows 23:51, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. —Fences&Windows 23:54, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Fences and windows. Even the WNBC storys, says, "Coke is just one of the many, many brands and advertisers looking to connect with you on Facebook...." Bearian (talk) 04:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable ad gimmick. I would discount the WNBC story completely myself because the NBC local sites have become irrelevant and rely more on junk pop culture content like this than actual local news these days. Nate • (chatter) 05:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. Interesting article, though. Le Docteur (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A Facebook app used as part of an ad campaign. Any notability guideline that would allow that to become an encyclopedia article would appear to need tightening. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 23:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it was more successful and garnered more press, you'd probably think differently. Though I improved the article, I'm not shocked at the deletes in light of the sourcing.--Milowent (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.