Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoinGate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Where it not for Enterprisey's comment, I would have gone with redirect. No prejudice against someboy re-creating this as a redirect on their own. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CoinGate[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NORG and notably WP:ORGDEPTH Dom from Paris (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 13:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 13:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 13:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect~~Delete~~ Fails GNG, per nom. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 14:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed to redirect per Bri below and ATD-R. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 11:06, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, wanted to nominate it myself. Renata (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Coingate scandal. WP:ORGDEPTH is going to continue to be a problem and the fact that a particular pornsite accepted this payment isn't really how to do an article. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the entire business seems to be a pilot program with 100 customers. That couldn't possibly ever pass WP:ORGDEPTH. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 03:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as CoinGate might be a search term for the company and Coingate (the scandal) isn't widely-known enough (in my judgment) to be the redirect target Enterprisey (talk!) 07:08, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.