Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coffee Road

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 01:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coffee Road[edit]

This article was prodded, but opposed, without any real reason. And since then has still not been sourced and is still orphaned. The article fails to verify notability. Dzhugashvili (talk) 14:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, article does not establish notability. HollyHuntaway (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've added two "refs" (simple footnotes for now), and you can see from my edit summary that I think this is worthy enough to save, but beyond that, /shrug. I don't have time right now to massage the rest of the refs, so I've placed a note on the talk page with three others which should be suitable to support saving the article. Hopefully can get back to it later, but feel free dot dot dot Yngvarr (t) (c) 14:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Historical road, some assertion of notability. Footnotes provided, though additional references will be required; since it is an historical subject nothing as quick and easy as a google search will turn enough up to demonstrate notability. An unsourced article should not automatically be deleted if sources can be found, and user yngvarr has provided references even if he does not have enough time to actually place in-line citations. Theseeker4 (talk) 15:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Another ref added. It may not be the Boston Post Road, but it is notable enough. Collect (talk) 21:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keepsignificant historical route with good references available. DGG (talk) 03:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DGG. Google Books has some sources. --NE2 10:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.