Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coffee Break Stories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 22:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coffee Break Stories[edit]

Coffee Break Stories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concerns with notability. FASTILY 07:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not mentioned in any independent source that I can locate: Noyster (talk), 12:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 23:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 01:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unable to find reliable secondary sources to establish notability. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 04:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Maybe one day, but a month or less after its creation is definitely WP:TOOSOON, as evidenced by the lack of coverage...by basically anyone anywhere. TimothyJosephWood 15:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.