Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Chupp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sources provided are apparently not sufficient for notabiliy Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Chupp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only a few WP:ROUTINE mentions (including his recent hire as a junior hockey coach). Fails WP:NHOCKEY by winning no major awards, records or playing in a high enough league for long enough for presumed notability. Yosemiter (talk) 20:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:19, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 17:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes GNG [1][2][3][4][5][6]. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Debatable, all those are from local papers where he either played or coached, covering that he has either been signed or hired. Such articles are typically considered WP:ROUTINE coverage of day-to-day happenings. Despite being from the local Lincoln paper, Number #2 is likely the most significant for GNG as it is not directly about him signing or being hired. If these types of articles were considered GNG, then even most Southern Professional Hockey League players would pass as they are decently covered by their local papers, especially signings.Yosemiter (talk) 20:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted to allow for more opinions/consideration regarding sources presented later in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and falls well short of WP:NHOCKEY. Deadman137 (talk) 19:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NHOCKEY. Some routine sports coverage is not enough to show notability. Papaursa (talk) 02:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.