Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Codal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. No significant coverage in major sources. Extant coverage consists of a minor local announcement and press releases. Ibadibam (talk) 02:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—Not too sure on that. Currently looking into it and already found a few articles from major news sources that could support the article. Also - being a Chicago area tech employee I can vouch for their credibility within the midwestern tech scene. To my knowledge they are one of the major players. Just my two cents. I'll add some references when I get a chance. Thanks! :: RatedR ^{Leg of Lamb} 15:19, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Please provide links as soon as you're able. Ibadibam (talk) 18:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@RatedRestricted: Anything? Ibadibam (talk) 00:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure essentially until I see any possible improvement and it indeed seems it's locally notable but my searches found nothing particularly good here and here so I'm willing to say draft & userfy for now. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I do not think there is even local notability. The links are PR or mentions. DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:PROMO advert, sources in the article can not establish notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH Kraxler (talk) 00:43, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.