Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coach Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 16:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coach Services[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus company, Only cites in the article all point to the companies website and there's nothing on Google News/Books nor Highbeam that establishes notability, Seems TOOSOON atm, Also fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 00:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Charlesdrakew, Onel5969 and SwisterTwister who edit bus related articles. –Davey2010^Talk 00:59, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless it can actually be better improved as my searches found nothing better and I'll wait and see if others find anything as they would've likely gotten something if they are actually notable considering it started in 1948. SwisterTwister talk 01:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unfortunately, unless an interested editor can find sourcing. Due to the commonality of the name, I can find zero about this particular company, although I looked through hundreds of hits on News. If better sourcing is found, please ping me and I'll take another look. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm struggling to find evidence of notability here, admittedly I only did a quick search to confirm what others were saying above. Jeni ^(talk) 13:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of sufficient notability _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 20:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.