Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde Aufner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clyde Aufner[edit]

Clyde Aufner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aufner was a college football player which in and of itself is not enough to establish notability. He last played college football no less than 2 years ago, in all likelihood, and the only source is the player bio from his university. He totally fails the notability guidelines for gridiron football. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:44, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a few passing mentions, but little else in coverage. Did not even sign with a NFL team as an undrafted free agent after his college career ended, so I don't see any claims of notability. Prevan (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete offensive linemen get bruises, not news coverage. It's rare for an OL to get enough coverage to pass WP:GNG and I don't see it happening here.--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Has not played pro football and thus fails WP:NGRIDIRON. No major awards, and I'm not finding significant coverage in reliable sources such that he does not pass either WP:NCOLLATH or WP:GNG either. Paul is also correct: whether fair or not, offensive linemen just don't get much coverage as compared to other position players. Cbl62 (talk) 00:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.