Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cluster-funk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cluster-funk[edit]
- Cluster-funk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 01:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO, WP:V and WP:RS. Cliff smith talk 01:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:NEO and WP:V.--SRX 01:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V and WP:NEO SkierRMH (talk) 02:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: At least one published book defines the term. It appears, however, to be self-published. That said, it and its website have a long list of press clippings, including some from the New York Times. This is not a keep vote. Just some info. Fixer1234 (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I did a search and cannot find any reliable sources -- Darth Mike (Talk • Contribs) 09:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failing WP:NEO at the very least. It asserts itself as a more polite variant of clusterfuck, which is covered pretty well under the wiktionary page. If this variant (with an 'n') was in any way verifiable then a footnote to either that page or to the snappily titled list of U.S. Marine Corps acronyms and expressions would suffice, rather than a dedicated article page. But as it isn't... it doesn't. OBM | blah blah blah 15:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:38, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clusterfuck is a notable slang term. Clusterfunk isn't anything. Ford MF (talk) 01:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.