Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clunge (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Clunge[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Clunge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's a neologism and an obscene one. There are links to where it's appeared, mostly in comedy and men's magazines. It could go to wiktionary.
I hope some commenters in the U.K. can help because it apparently is from there. CynofGavuf 16:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This neologism isn't suitable or notable enough for Wikipedia. Urban Dictionary maybe. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:NEO. Warrah (talk) 22:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable slang. TJRC (talk) 02:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and WP:SALT Per WP:NEO and WP:DICTIONARY VernoWhitney (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.