Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Anthems Vol. 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. Essentially, nobody made any argument towards keeping any of these whatsoever. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Club Anthems Vol. 1[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages, helpfully arrayed on Template:Ultra Records compilations:

None of these identically constructed, bare-bones articles (on compilation records from a label called Ultra Records) offers any assertion, let alone evidence, of meeting WP:NALBUM. Redirect all to their respective series. — swpb^T 21:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:11, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia has minimal standards, such as those at WP:GNG or at WP:NALBUM. The content in these articles includes no attempt to meet Wikipedia's standards. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:21, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ultra Music or delete as clearly these unsourced articles are not meeting WP:NALBUM. But question for User:swpb -- if your desired outcome is a redirect, why bring all these to AFD? These articles are pretty cold, having been created in 2010 and left largely untouched since. I don't think it'd be controversial to just redirect them (or probably even WP:PROD them. A Train^talk 17:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Because there are so many, because people here may argue (as Blue Rasberry did) for going further than redirecting, and because an AfD closure will set an explicit precedent to use if any are recreated, or any others in the set are created later. —swpb^T 18:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right, fair enough. :) A Train^talk 18:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment redirecting them seems better than deleting as it would be easier to keep a track of if they are abused again and in case someone will look for look for them that they are easily found. Ivory Cowboy. --The Ivory Cowboy 🤠 (talk) 02:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- As per WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP. --The Ivory Cowboy 🤠 (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Indeffed as confirmed sock of Donald Trung. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 00:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no prejudice to redirects being created. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 00:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect to their respective series as proposed by nominator or to Ultra Music as proposed by A Train?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 11:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as nn albums and because there's no need to preserve the article history. Compilation albums are rarely notable and these ones miss the mark. No objects to redirects being created after the fact. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.