Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloudred

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cloudred[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only created for Promotional purpose. COI issues. Non-notable as per encyclopedic standards. Light2021 (talk) 18:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- clearly excluded as WP:NOTSPAM: a client prospectus / sales brochure, with content such as:

Widener University Assistant Dean of Civic Engagement Elizabeth Housholder identified an unmet campus need: a better way to communicate volunteer opportunities to students. She approached Cloudred with her idea for an interactive website in 2012! Etc.

Not notable on top of that. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete To piggy back clearly violates WP:NPOV . Also uses insufficent sources from personal accounts that do not meet WP:NCORP — Preceding unsigned comment added by HDavis2017 (talk • contribs) 07:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: clearly violates WP:SOAPBOX. DrStrauss talk 16:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.