Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloe "Bratz"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 18:58, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Cloe "Bratz"

Delete as non-notable, unless someone is willing to merge and redirect. Deltabeignet 00:50, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Please put a bit more effort into your nominations. This nom, as it stands, is indistinguishable from a vote ... and not a very good vote, at that. The ideal nomination should explain why an article merits deletion, in an effort to convince others to vote accordingly. It's not just "delete nn", and it's certainly not "delete nn or merge, I don't mind, I couldn't be bothered." fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. No redirect is necessary because it is unlikely that someone will search for this exact title. Per WP:FICT any useful information should be included in Bratz. "Useful information" does not include speculation about the astrological sign of this fictional character, as currently included in the article under debate. --Metropolitan90 02:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. She is notable enough to be merged if we had a decent article as per Wikipedia:Fiction. A Google search shows 147,000 results [1] so she is well-known and at this stage of development a merge would be best. However, this article has little worth merging. A redirect wouldn't be much use as few people are going to search for this title. A redirect could be created at Cloe as a search shows that the Bratz article is the only one where that name is mentioned. Capitalistroadster 02:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
  • "Cloe" as a redirect would be more useful at Chloe, I think. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for all the reasons that have been stated already. On a side-note, I HATE BRATZ! --Grande 16:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Bratz, no merge. The content of this article is almost completely fancruft (trvia about the character's hair, personality, etc....why?). --FuriousFreddy 01:31, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Delete (or Redirect to Bratz). I'm a little unsure because I can see someone wanting this Info, and if was cleaned up why not? But it just doesn't fit my idea lf encyclopedic. There's a place for this, a fan page.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.