Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clockwork (deadmau5 song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clockwork (deadmau5 song)[edit]

Clockwork (deadmau5 song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlike other deadmau songs, "Clockwork" never charted so neglecting secondary coverage is not much of an option. All the sources provided and can be found through searches are not reliable outlets for secondary coverage. Thus, it fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No reliable source coverage found, no properly sourced content to merge anywhere else. Not really worth a redirect to the artist's discography article. --Michig (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No sourcing that meets the WP:GNG, didn't chart, and there's basically no content present anyways. Sergecross73 msg me 19:54, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. No reliable sources are present. Antonioatrylia (talk) 22:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.