Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Dempster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff Dempster[edit]

Cliff Dempster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, no reliable sources available. Creator is User:CliffordDempster Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 03:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I found several sources noting Dempster and his involvement with very notable Canadian productions. Candleabracadabra (talk) 05:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not seeing anything to source out this unreferenced BLP. Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 02:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Not enough sources, and all sources show the subject as not notable. Epicgenius (talk) 15:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – no minimally substantial quantity of RS DocumentError (talk) 07:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No evidence of the reliable source coverage that is necessary to properly demonstrate notability. As always, a person is not entitled to keep a Wikipedia article just because they exist. Bearcat (talk) 23:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.