Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clever Lane Development School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clever Lane Development School[edit]

Clever Lane Development School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established for over 5 years, no references. Puffin Let's talk! 15:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - We keep schools wth high school streams because experience shows that, with enough research, sources can almost invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a poor tool for finding sources on schools in the Philipines. Very few have much of an Internet presence. We need to avoid systemic bias and encourage local hard-copy and local language sources to be investigated. The Whispering Wind (talk) 18:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Since it is a secondary school which is at least verified to exist, and we tend to keep such articles per WP:OUTCOMES. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:14, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as normally for high schools. I do not see why this was relisted. DGG ( talk ) 18:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per longstanding consensus for secondary schools of confirmed existence. The name of the school probably obscures the fact that it includes grades 10-12, which is the commonly accepted threshold for autokeeping at AfD. Carrite (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.